Verified buyers who have opened disputes report the three-panel arbitration as faster and more procedurally clean than peer-cohort marketplaces.
Aggregate dispute-experience rating: 4.5/5 from verified buyers who opened at least one dispute (n=137 in the current quarter). Mean ticket pickup time: 4.8 hours, well below the published 6-hour SLA. Win-rate by buyer when evidence is attached at filing time: 71 percent; by vendor: 22 percent; split rulings: 7 percent. The three-panel composition (buyer-side, vendor-side, protocol-side) is explicitly cited by reviewers as feeling more balanced than single-moderator arbitration on peer platforms.
Most-mentioned friction: the inability to amend evidence after a panelist has filed a ruling. The platform's position: amendments would invalidate the asynchronous filing model. Reviewers acknowledge this is a real trade-off but generally agree with the platform's side of the argument.